Homepage
The whole page shown as two tall columns, from the first screen with the main promise down to the footer.
Storefronts we designed and built, across supplements, fragrance, health, wellness and skincare.
All 35 projectsFour engagements, measured before and after. What changed, why it changed, and by how much.
All case studiesDiagnosis, design and development from one studio — so the recommendation and the build never disagree.
All five services147 real Shopify stores torn down page by page, scored, and shown beside the version we would build. Free to watch.
Browse all teardownsSix conversion-first themes, each built for one industry’s buying journey. Zero required apps, $300, one licence.
Compare all sixA review of the Scooters HQ homepage, collection pages and product pages, covering why a store with strong brand distribution reads as a catalog instead of a guided buying experience.
Pressing play loads the video from YouTube — you can allow it for every teardown under cookie preferences.
Scooters HQ carries distribution from established manufacturers, so the catalog itself carries real credibility. The homepage has sections worth keeping, the product pages are set up sensibly at the top, and the reviews collected through Judge.me are genuinely strong. Shop Pay and the Shop app are already in place, and the collection filters go beyond the Shopify default that most stores never touch.
The problem is not the products. It is that the website, the salesman of the business, is not trying to sell. It shows what is available and stops there. A homepage should answer what this is, who it is for, and whether the company can be trusted, then route the visitor to the right collection or product. Right now the information exists but it is scattered, and the visitor has to work to assemble it.
The same pattern repeats down the funnel. Collection pages open with a long blob of text nobody reads, then a grid of names and prices with nothing to compare on, so choosing means opening five tabs and holding specs in memory. Almost every product shows a discount, which cancels the meaning of a sale. The product page starts strong then ends at the buy box, with specs and resources dumped unread and no add ons offered.
The direction is a guided buying experience: trust first, then routes by lifestyle and fit, a finder for people who do not know what they need, rich product cards that support comparison, monthly pricing shown next to four-figure totals, and accessories at the moment the decision is already made. Stop showing the visitor everything and start taking them to the right scooter.
The site behaves as a catalog rather than a salesman. Information exists but sits scattered, so visitors must connect the dots themselves on four-figure purchases with no guided route to the right scooter.
Scooters HQ can become the specialist a mobility buyer trusts: a homepage that establishes credibility and routes by use case, collection grids that allow comparison at a glance, and product pages that break price into monthly terms.
Fewer visitors leaving without choosing, more add to carts on higher priced scooters, fewer abandoned carts once financing is visible, and a larger average order through relevant accessories.
Five dimensions, each scored out of ten.
16 issues found, 24 fixes proposed.
The site displays what is available and stops. It does not convince, compare, or lead a visitor toward a decision, which is the whole job of an ecommerce store selling four-figure scooters.
A visitor cannot quickly tell what this is, who it is for, or why this company can be trusted. The happy rider in the hero image carries the whole burden of explaining the business.
The credibility signals exist somewhere on the site, but they sit in separate places. The visitor has to hunt for them and connect the dots on their own before they feel safe buying.
Nothing on the homepage sorts a visitor by use case or need. Having the right scooter in the catalog does nothing if the person who wants it never reaches its page.
The promotional banner appears the moment someone lands, before they know what the store sells or have looked at a single scooter. The offer lands as a distraction rather than an incentive.
A long paragraph sits above the products on collection pages. At that length it is either skipped entirely or skimmed for two lines, so the value being explained does not land.
Almost every product in the collection carries a discount, some in the hundreds. When the whole grid is marked down, a shopper reads it as inflated list pricing rather than a real saving.
The collection grid gives no range, weight capacity, wheel count, or airline status. There is nothing on the card a shopper can use to narrow the field.
To weigh two scooters a visitor must open each product page, memorise the specs, and come back. That effort is where people stop comparing, get frustrated, and leave.
Shop Pay is available but sits away from where the price is read. A visitor sees $2,500 or $3,500 as a single upfront number with no monthly alternative beside it.
The spec and resource sections on the product page carry a lot of information in a form nobody reads. The detail is there; the structure that makes it usable is not.
The Judge.me reviews are genuinely good but sit low on the page doing nothing to persuade. They are stored rather than used at the moment a buyer is deciding.
When a scooter has no reviews of its own, the page displays an empty review block. Store-level reviews already exist and could be filling that space.
What should be the opening of the page is effectively the end of it. After the product information there is nothing further built to move a visitor toward buying.
A buyer committing to a $1,995 scooter is shown no batteries, covers, baskets, or protection plans. Several hundred dollars of natural add ons go unoffered on every order.
Most of the traffic arrives on a phone, yet the current pages read as desktop-first. The scattered information and heavy text blocks cost more on a small screen.
State who the business is, what it sells, and how long it has been doing it, above the fold. Make the first screen answer the trust question before it shows a single product.
Place a short value block directly under the hero covering service, expertise, and support, so the reasons to buy here rather than elsewhere arrive before any product does.
Offer routes for travel and flying, everyday errands, indoor use, outdoor adventure, and heavy duty. A visitor who knows their situation should reach the right shortlist in one click.
Alongside lifestyle, give paths for airline ready, stability and comfort, and power and range. Different buyers arrive thinking in different terms and both framings should be served.
Ask three or four questions about use, travel needs, and terrain, then recommend specific models. This is the digital version of a salesman asking how they can help.
Introduce products only after credibility is established and the paths are offered. The homepage job is routing and trust; product display comes after both are done.
Set the store against marketplaces and local dealers on expertise, support, and selection. Give the visitor a reason to prefer a specialist over a search box.
The established manufacturers behind the catalog are real credibility already earned. Present them as a named section on the homepage rather than leaving them buried in product detail.
Keep the incentive but place it on the product page or a specific step where a visitor has already shown interest. The offer is worth more once it is answering a real hesitation.
Cut the opening paragraph to a short introduction plus a few trust factors, then use heading and short description pairs so a visitor can skim to the part they care about.
Show range, weight capacity, wheel count, and airline status in the grid. Let a shopper narrow six scooters down to two without opening a single product page.
Offer folding, outdoor, and heavy duty as one-tap choices at the top of the collection, with the fuller filter set alongside the grid for anyone who wants to go deeper.
Take the discount off most of the catalog and keep it on a small number of models. A sale on three scooters reads as genuine and leaves the rest positioned as premium.
Display the Shop Pay monthly figure next to the price on both collection and product pages, so $1,995 also reads as roughly $83 a month at the moment of the decision.
Keep name, reviews, price with financing, eligibility, and reassurances in the buy box. Move specifications and resources further down where extra reading belongs.
For models that qualify, state the eligibility in the buy box and explain briefly what it means for cost. For a mobility purchase this can change the decision entirely.
Where a discount is real and limited, say so next to the price on the product page. Tie the urgency to the actual offer rather than applying it site wide.
Present the plan in the buy box as an optional choice a buyer can accept or skip. On a scooter at this price, cover is a natural question that is currently left unanswered.
Offer a spare lithium battery, front storage basket, and all weather cover once the main decision is made. These carry better margin than the distributed scooters themselves.
Include cup holder, basket, safety flag, padded travel bag, and folding ramp further down. Buyers who need these will otherwise order them elsewhere after the fact.
Tell the visitor checkout takes about sixty seconds and show a quick buy option. Removing the fear of a long form keeps the decision from cooling between the page and the cart.
Where a scooter has no reviews of its own, fill that space with the store-level reviews already collected instead of showing an empty block.
Most of the traffic arrives on a phone, so the guided paths, finder, rich cards, and monthly pricing all need to be checked on a small screen before desktop.
Answer the recurring questions about range, portability, and support directly on each product page so a visitor does not leave to find them.
A concept redesign created by Convertica Studio from this audit. It shows how the store could work, it is not the live store.
The whole page shown as two tall columns, from the first screen with the main promise down to the footer.
The product page on the left, the homepage in the centre and the collection page on the right, so the shared look is easy to see.
The full page as two tall columns: the buy box and gallery first, then the details, guidance and questions down to the footer.
The header and the buy box, with the price, financing and the trust lines a careful buyer looks for.
The header, the shop-by-use band, the filters and the first row of scooters with their key facts and prices.
Home, collection and product on a phone, with the buy bar staying in reach on the product page.
No. The distribution comes from established manufacturers and the products carry real credibility. The audit is about the website, which presents those products as a list rather than making the case for them.
A salesman in a physical store asks what you need, takes you to the right section, answers your worries, and suggests what goes with it. The site currently does none of that. It shows the shelves and leaves the visitor to work it out.
The offer is fine; the timing is not. It appears before the visitor knows what the store sells or has considered a single scooter. Moved to a product page, where someone is weighing a decision, the same offer does real work.
When almost the whole grid is marked down, shoppers read it as inflated list pricing rather than a saving. Keeping the discount on two or three models makes those genuinely stand out and positions the rest as premium.
The information a buyer uses to narrow the field: range, weight capacity, wheel count, and whether it is airline ready. Right now the card carries a long product name and a price, which is not enough to choose on.
Because it is available but not where the price is read. A visitor seeing $2,500 as one upfront number decides differently from one who also sees roughly $200 a month beside it. The tool is in place; the placement is the fix.
The audit references a wedding dress store where showing monthly pricing at the point of decision tripled add to carts and reduced abandoned carts, and a furniture store with roughly $2,000 products that saw improved sales and fewer abandonments.
It is a short set of questions about how the scooter will be used, which then recommends specific models. It replaces browsing with guidance, which matters most for the visitor who knows their situation but not the product range.
They can be sourced independently rather than through the current distribution. Batteries, covers, baskets, safety flags, travel bags, and ramps are things a scooter buyer needs anyway, and they carry better margin than the scooters.
Not when the items are genuinely relevant. Someone who has just decided on a scooter will need a cover or a spare battery eventually. Offering them in the same order is more convenient than making them buy elsewhere later.
Yes. The concept includes the mobile layouts for the homepage, collection, and product pages. Most traffic arrives on a phone, so showing only desktop would not be an honest picture of how the changes work.
The recording runs 36 minutes. It covers the homepage, a collection page, and a product page as a visitor experiences them, then walks through the redesign our design team built for all three, including the mobile views, and closes with the next steps and the conversion calculator.
Tell us about your store and we'll send a personalized 5-minute video showing exactly where you're losing buyers — and how to win them back.
Takes about 40 seconds. No call required.